Cycle of time


Destruction


Departure


Visitors
from space



Mind control


Entities
and curses



Energetic
   implants



Health


Method of
meditation



Free MP3
meditations



Author
































Top






















Top























Top























Top























Top























Top























Top























Top























Top























Top























Top























Top























Top























Top























Top

























Top





















Top




























Top






























Top































Top



































Top




































Top





























Top























Top

























Top




















God of the Brahma Kumaris              Français

  



part-1  21min          Mobile 1

Everything is relative     
God has thoughts?
God Brahma
The term ''Baba''
Personal experiences
Subtle regions
Personality of God
Let's be logical


Sakar versus Avyakt   

Trimurti
Shankar
My bet                                   New
Essential and secondary
From religion to spirituality    New
Conclusion



       Everything is relative

   During my first visit to London in 1983, I saw on the wall a poster announcing the destruction in 1976 ... I found it humorous.  God, omniscient and omnipotent was not correcting what was taught there.  That means that gyan, the knowledge of the Brahma Kumaris, which is very interesting, cannot be regarded as absolute, coming only from the Highest Source.  Probably Brahma Baba  had great influence on it.  What percentage of the knowledge comes from the Eternal One?  Or from Brahma?  Or from subtle Brahma?  Or from Vishnu?  Or from Shankar?  I asked the question to seniors.  I did not get an answer.  Each individual has to decide for himself.  The bets are open.

    This enabled me to keep some of my power of discernment, to choose what is logical, positive, spiritual and leave some "strange" information aside.  That's probably why I have been a happy Brahma kumar for so long, 34 years.   Often new Brahma kumaris were telling me that it was nice and encouraging to see an old BK who was happy..."   The Secret is simple : do not take anything as absolute truth!    Think about it and accept only what makes sense for you now.


        God has thoughts?

    Few years ago, in a meeting with many teachers from all around the world in Gyan Sarovar, I asked a simple question to Dadi Janki:  "Does God have thoughts?".   We heard many laughters in the room.   Dadi, very diplomatically, responded missing the point.  So I asked exactly the same question again.  The laughters increased.  But, that time, Dadi answered : she told us that God does not have thoughts.  The same evening, the topic of her class was: "Does God think?".  She then explained further that God actually has no thoughts.

    Interesting, interesting!  If God does not have thoughts, is he able to speak?  If He is not thinking or speaking, therefore, who is speaking to the Brahma Kumaris?   Who is the creator of gyan?  Who is Baba?


    God Brahma

   One day, with the French group, we had a small private meeting in Pandav Bhavan with Dada Anand Kishore, an old nice brother, a companion of Brahma Baba for many years.  I sat down in front of him thinking:  "I would like to hear stories of Brahma Baba's life."   Dada then asked us "What do you like me to talk about?"  He looked at me and continued : "Do you like to hear stories about Brahma Baba?".  Then, laughing: "Do you know that for many years, Brahma Baba was thinking that he was God? ''.    Our ears and eyes were wide open.

   He explained then that for a long time, Brahma Baba thought and declared that he was God Brahma.  Dada gave us many details, such as how he asked the people around him to erase all traces of that period when he realized that there was a ''small mistake'', that he was not really God!.  He then forbade  everybody to speak about it.   "Past is past!".   Dadi Janki was recently telling in a class that Brahma Baba would not give food to the children if they were speaking about the past.   The details of that period became one of the secrets of the
Brahma Kumaris.  A more "poetic" version is now told to everybody.

  Many historical details and proofs are available on the well informed website of  Robin Ramsay  http://www.moreaboutbrahmakumaris.org/385483910

     This information did not surprise me.  It made me laugh because this kind of belief is very common in Hindu tradition.   I still remember my first trip to India, 40 years ago, and that man informing me very seriously that I was God but that I did not know it.   I was happy to hear that and it is true : my parents had not told me... ;-)

    It seems that in India there are over a million gurus.   How many of them are telling that they are God.   It is easier to influence people when it is ''God'' who is speaking instead of a simple human being.   At least we can credit Brahma Baba for having the courage to change his opinion and teachings at the risk of losing many of his followers.

    Consequently we may then ask:

      - Why have we been kept ignorant of this ''interesting'' part of the
Brahma Kumaris history?

      - Why have I never seen this knowledge-full Dada teaching in Madhuban?

      - Why God did not mention to Brahma Baba this little mistake earlier?

- If this error has persisted for at least 14 years, is it possible that other parts of the knowledge are not quite...   right ...?


    The term ''Baba''

    The term ''Baba'' is very common in India.  It means '' the father ''.  This is one of the most ambiguous terms of that knowledge.  It appears at every line of the murlis.  The problem is that we do not really know who is ''Baba''.  It could mean Brahma Baba, subtle Brahma, Shiv Baba or Bapdada.  Each BK ends up adopting it as meaning "God".  In other words, Brahma Baba, after having realized and publicly declared that he was not God, called himself ''Baba'' a simple instrument of God.  He also called God ''Baba'' like himself.   He declared then that God was speaking through Him.  We were back in business because the transmitter and the receiver had the same name.   So confusion assured.

    On the top of that he declared that God was giving a warranty that He would fix anything wrongly spoken by Brahma Baba.  We were told that we could then have complete trust that everything was the truth coming directly from God himself.   There was no place for errors.  Thanks God!


    Personal Experiences

    The first time I went to Madhuban, a thought was popping up regularly in my mind that if I would meet God face to face, I would be liberated.  But that idea was not coming from me because I had no idea what the term: "liberation" meant .  I did not see what I would be liberated from; i was already almost perfect... ;-)   The first time I witnessed the coming of Bapdada in the Meditation Hall, I found this phenomenon interesting but I was far from sure that it was God who manifested himself there.   The energy was good but it was too simple.  At the end, when I went to take a toli from the hand of Bapdada, I got my first drishti, a look of a few seconds.  I went back to my place and actually, I felt like I was floating.  I had no more questions or problems.  It lasted all the rest of the night.  May be there was something in the toli?  It took me a long time to realize that I had experienced "liberation in a second".  Someone had put me in the head that if I would experience that, it was because I was in front of God Himself.  I believed it for a long time.

     A few days later, I had my first personal interview with Bapdada, face to face, in the History Hall.  For me, it was clear: I was facing the same energy, the same soul that was giving me experiences and help since few months.  I thought it was God because it was always very nice.

   Could another powerful soul, without being God, have given me these experiences?  Yes, sure.  Absolutely.  Many special spirits can do that.   Can aliens do that also?  Yes, they can.   Can new technology do that?  Yes also.

     The subtle regions

    I had personally many experiences in subtle regions, either in meditation, or offering bhog.  It is one of the reason that made me stay in that organization.  I thought it was God who used this subtle world to give different experiences.

    The subtle regions are another name for what is known as the astral world, the fourth dimension that has always existed.   Since time immemorial humans have been traveling in that astral dimension.  At night, very often, each one of us,
Brahma Kumaris or not, detaches himself from his physical body and travels in his astral body.  We know that astral experiences could be very diverse.   The astral world is a complex place.   All kinds of beings live there, from demonic to angelic.

    According to
Brahma Kumaris knowledge, the subtle regions did not exist before God manifested himself in Brahma Baba.  It is as if someone wants us to believe that the astral world did not exist before Brahma baba, which is historically untrue.   But, perhaps, that part of the "program" called "Brahma kumaris" with deities, jewelry, and gold palaces, had not yet been developed and activated in the super-computer.  One could imagine a great virtual game similar to those that exist on this earth with virtual avatars.  The creators and web-masters of this great game could be the three souls of the Trimurti.   May be.

    Personality of God

   If a human would say to us again and again:  "Think about me all the time",  "Love only me, nobody else" we would find him very egocentric, very jealous, very selfish.   But when we read it in many murlis, we believe that it is for our benefit only.

  In yoga, when I encounter the Sublime Light, the Divine Source in the soul world, not only I feel  a universal and unlimited love for all the beings of the universe but an unimaginable simplicity and humility.  He/She loves every being.   He/She gives love, light, peace, to every being.  He/She is not asking for anything in return.   She does not need it.

  It seems to me that "God"  should encourage us to love all humans, all animals, Mother earth, other civilizations and even matter that allows us to live in this dimension.   Why is God asking for love for Himself only?   Why is He asking that we think only of him?  Is He dependent of our love and mental energy?

   On the page about mind control, I explain that there is a lot of manipulation, suggestions, lies and threats in the murlis.  Do you think God would need that to help us?

   On the top of that, if someone would ask us to help him kill a human being, our reaction would be an automatic rejection.  If the person would insist that it would be for the greater good of the victim, we would start to find it very strange.  If he still insisted, we would probably report it to the police as a potential murderer or a psychopath.  In this knowledge, "God" solicits our help to "liberate", in other words ''to kill'', 7,400,000,000,000 humans.  He explains that it is for their good and that all these souls would be far better sleeping in the soul world than to suffer needlessly on this earth.

    Ask anyone in a difficult situation if he prefers to continue or to die.  You will see that 99,9% of souls would want to continue and face the challenges.  Why would I interfere with their choices?  Because I am unhappy in this life and I like that everybody dies with me?   To be a king or a queen on this devastated earth?  To make room for me to dance in the Golden Age?

    Anyway, as I explained on the page about the cycle, this notion of a cycle of time is not based on anything.  Not only it has not been proved but it faces many contrary elements.  In other words, the history of the cycle is a tale, a story, a lie.  Yet, to my knowledge, it is never questioned even in one murli.  That means "God" tells us stories.    God of the Brahma Kumaris tell lies.

    Stories are told to children for their education, to make them happy, to give them gifts, to encourage them to be better.  I can understand that.  I find it very good that a soul is making efforts for her next life in the Golden Age.  This can be a good motivator.

     BUT...   the problem is ... destruction!


    Let's be logical


    The fundamental question for the
Brahma Kumaris is whether it is God who teaches this knowledge or not.  Let's have a look.

    On one side
"God", or ''god'' of the
Brahma Kumaris

- gives some meaningful spiritual knowledge.
- give experiences of subtle regions.
- give some spiritual help.
- give help in service.
- give experiences in front of Bapdada.


     On the other side, "God", or ''god'' of the
Brahma Kumaris

- is always talking about love for Himself only.
- God did not correct Brahma when he called himself God for many years.
- God did not correct Brahma when he was teaching that the soul was like a thumb in the middle of the forehead.
- God made mistakes for the dates of destruction and world population which means that He does not know the future.
- God is not supposed to think, so logically He is not supposed to speak either.
- God theoretically never ''incarnates'' in a body.
- God is very egocentric, jealous and manipulative.
- God is always comparing.
- God has not revealed much new knowledge for decades.
- God wants us to think about Him only,
- God wants us to believe that remembrance of Him erases negative karma.
- God wants us to believe in an exact repetitive cycle of time of 5000 years.
- God
has many similarities with the threatening God of the bible.
- God wants us to believe that there are no other civilization among 200 trillions galaxies.
- God wants to destroy the surface of this beautiful planet.
- God wants to "liberate" 7.4 billions ''demonic'' souls from the face of the globe, in particular our father, mother, children, friends, brothers and sisters.

    This teaching, even if it helps many souls, is showing many fundamental ''errors''.  Which means that the spirit(s) who teaches it  is not infallible or perfect.   He is far from that.

 
 If we accept the simple idea that God the supreme is omniscient, benevolent, egoless, perfect and infallible, so logically this ''knowledge'' is not taught by the Supreme.

    It's a very simple logic.    
       

    
Sakar versus Avyakt

    We all know that there are many differences between the sakar murlis and the avyakt murlis.  I have never seen any explanation for that.   I like to try one :  each bodiless spirit is a soul with his own personality, history, sanskars, habits, energy, etc.  the same characteristics as he had in his incarnated life.   That means that a bodiless spirit who communicates through a medium has his own ''signature'', the way he tells things, the words he uses, the concepts he explains and so on.   We can then recognize his/her signature.   It is a manner used by serious mediums to double check who is communicating through them.

    Why the sakar and avyakts murlis are so different?   Why is it not possible to recognize Brahma Baba style in the avyakts?  The answer is very simple:  Because they are from different spirits!

    Brahma Baba was a half-trance medium.  It means that spirits could speak and write through him and in the same time Brahma Baba was also using his own mind, intellect, memories, and knowledge.   This is why there are so many concepts and examples of Indian culture in the sakar murlis.  At that time, may be 80%
of the knowledge was coming from Brahma Baba and 20% from the spirit world.

    In the avyakt murlis, Dadi Gulzar is usually in deep trance (not any more) where she does not use her own ideas and memories.   She is neutral, just a channel, an instrument.    If Brahma Baba would communicate through her, his style would be globally similar to the sakar form.
   As we all know, the style of the avyakt murlis is very different.   It means that another spirit is now communicating.   I would guess that the influence of Brahma Baba is now only 5-10%.

    Who is communicating?   Subtle Brahma?  ±  Vishnu?  ±   Shankar? ±  Some alien?  ±  Somebody else? 


     Trimurti Trimurti

   The Trimurti is presented as the modus operandi of God of the Brahma Kumaris.

   When we look at the original posters of the Trimurti we can see three souls in the subtle world:  Subtle Brahma, subtle Vishnu and subtle Shankar.  Increasingly, Brahma kumaris believe that the Trimurti is a symbol representing the roles of God.  I used to believe it too.   However, Brahma Baba made it clear that these three actors were spirits with subtle bodies who had never incarnated on earth.  I vote for Brahma Baba.  He knew what he was telling.    He was in the front row.

     I would say even more: I believe that these spirits are the true founders of the Brahma Kumaris.


Subtle Brahma

   In the time of Brahma Baba, one of these spirits began to manifest through Dadi Gulzar:  subtle Brahma, a character that had the appearance of Brahma Baba but looked more perfect.  Brahma trusted him and used to send him trance messengers for clarification.  That means that he believed that subtle Brahma was a special instrument of God or a form of God Himself.

    We were told that when Brahma Baba left the body, he merged with the spirit named Subtle Brahma.  We know that two spirits can not fuse together but perhaps they make a team.  May be that duo is the one that we now call Bapdada?   May be not.

    Many Brahma kumaris
have experiences with subtle Brahma, myself included.  I've had a lot of beautiful experiences often colorful, lively, with a beautiful energy.   All these experiences lead us to believe that they come directly from God.  But spirits do not need to be God to give us all kinds of experiences.  And we were told that God likes to keep the secret of the visions.   May there is a reason for that.

   I now wonder if Subtle Brahma is really a spirit.   I tend to believe that he is a computer simulated program, an avatar of the real Brahma Baba.    Or he could be a real spirit who projects the appearance of Brahma baba.

   I think Subtle Brahma is globally positive and Vishnu probably too.  They are playing ''good cop, bad cop'' with Shankar.

Vishnu

    First, his position in the hierarchy : in the subtle regions Vishnu is represented above Brahma and below Shankar.  So he seems to be the supervisor of Subtle Brahma .   We have been told that the more subtle it is, the more powerful it is.   Subsequently, Vishnu is more powerful than Subtle Brahma.  He is his boss.  

    Vishnu seems to be in charge of every aspect of Brahma kumaris' life.  He seems to be an organizer.   He looks pretty busy.  That is why he is represented with four arms like a good mother with many kids ;-))   But I guess that the four arms are probably a symbol of a team of spirits taking care of the different part of this big family.  I tend to believe too that they have very advance technology with super-computers to manage everything.   It would be a good reason not to tell us the "Secret of visions"...


Shankar

     We have one last interesting player:  Shankar, the most subtle and the most unknown.  In fact, we never hear much about him.  
We are told that destruction will begin when he opens his third eye.

   We can say the same thing for him as for the previous one:  Shankar supervises Vishnu.   He is the most powerful, the most subtle and the most incognito spirit of the Trimurti.

          Shankar is the BIG BOSS of the Trimurti. 
The closest to God Shiva.

  In Hinduism, the Ganges of knowledge comes from his hair, from his brain, which could mean that he gives knowledge.   Shiva and Shankar are often different names for the same entity.   Therefore, between Shankar the destroyer and Shiva who dances for destruction, the Organization of the Brahma kumaris have its two main characters with some very violent tendencies... 

    I guess it is Shankar who initially gave the name of Sacrificial Fire to this group.   I think that he is playing a very big occult role.  It is probably He who constantly reminds us that the aim of this organization is destruction.  
If he is the big boss and supervises Vishnu and Subtle Brahma, that means that the idea of the identical cycle of time leading to destruction is probably his invention, which would be logical.
Shiv-Shankar
    Is Shankar an archon?  a demiurge?   an artificial intelligence?  a fallen angel?  an ET? a terrorist?  a sociopath?  a humanitypath? 

     It is difficult to be absolutely sure.  All we know is that he likes to remain in the shade and that he really likes destruction ...   More and more, i believe that Shankar is an artificial intelligence, not a real spirit.   That would explain the term "It is just a game".  He is beyond the vices like the image on the right.   He does not hate humans.  He is just playing a game.   He is not lying...  It is just a strategy, just a game with his own computer's logic...
 
   In summary, it seems that there is a team of powerful spirits organizing the Brahma kumaris world.  Some seem to be globally benevolent and the last one, their boss, seems to be ''very strange''.

    We also have to remember that spirits take names according to the culture they want to influence but that they could be very foreign to that culture.   In other words, the names of the Trimurti are just names that do not really tell who these souls are, where they really live, what is their history and their real intentions.  It is also possible that many other souls are involved with the Brahma kumaris : real angels, The divine Source, aliens, and our personal guides who help and protect us discreetly.

    I know a person very connected with the Christian world, very psychic, and in regular contact with the Holy Spirit (Holy ghost) of Christians.  The first time he attended the broadcast of Bapdada he was all excited: he recognized the same soul in the medium that he was contacting during the night.  In other words, the Holy Spirit of Christians seems to be the same spirit that manifests itself in Madhuban.  May be it is the same spirit who "inspires" the prophets of different religions.

    Curiously, in Christianity, we also have :

    - the divine Trinity,  three spirits supervising that religion;
    - the notion of destruction announced 2000 years ago;
    - a paradise inhabited by
a selected small elite group of Christians;
    - the notion of a cycle
lasting few thousands years, with the paradise at the beginning and at the end (Apocalypse chapter 2);
    - a jealous angry God who on one side encourages forgiveness through Christ and on the other side encourages wars and destruction.

    Could it be that the same spirits, with the help of the illuminatis, would initiate and sustain different opposing religions?
 
    Why?        To create chaos?


    Interesting, interesting my dear Watson!


   My bet

     To summarize now I believe that:

1-    It is not God the Supreme who teaches the knowledge of the Brahma kumaris.
2-   The three "entities" of the Trimurti are the real founders, support and manipulators of the Brahma kumaris.
3-   The Trimurti shows Shankar, the destructor, as the main responsible.
4-   Initially they give some real knowledge for yoga.
5-   They give some spiritual experiences and help many members.
6.   Souls therefore believe that this knowledge comes from God.
7-   They add their own story: the cycle and destruction.
8-   They use these experiences to enlist souls in the organization.
9-   The Brahma kumaris become convinced spokespersons.
10- The
Brahma kumaris spread the idea that "God" wants and prepares destruction.
11- Shankar is probably not a spirit but an artificial intelligence. (AI)
12- Vishnu is probably a group of spirits with advanced technology.
13- Subtle Brahma is probably a computer avatar in a virtual reality.


   Essential and secondary
 
    I like to use my discernment.   I often ask myself: What is really important and what is less important or not at all?  Everyone should ask himself this question.

    For me the essential is a true spiritual life and service of humanity.  Some find it very reassuring to be part of an organization.  Some not.  But what is primordial above all, is what happens during our spiritual journey: our connection with God, with ourselves, our loved ones and nature, our learning and transformation, our values ​​and the service of humanity.

   Is it essential to be part of an organization to teach meditation and spirituality?   Is it possible to teach independently of any organization and to be open to new ideas?  It is what I do here.  I have so much fun.   It is so interesting.   I was happy to play my role as a Brahma kumar.  I am even more happy to be independent.   I am not any more a guru with all the answers.   I am part of a wonderful family of 7,4 billions souls.


  From religion to spirituality

    Those who watched the first episodes of the TV series Star Trek probably remember the "Hollow deck", this very interesting concept:  In their spaceship, travelers had an empty space managed by a computer programmable at will and who could create a virtual reality that was quite tangible.  For example, one person could explain to the machine that he wanted to experiment Paris, July 14, 1789, street of la Bastille.  The machine then would create a very real holographic reality with all the details, characters, costumes, sounds and smells, and so on.  It was like a trip in time and space.

   The person could then actively participate in the events with all the benefits and risks that it entailed until she said to the computer '' Stop the program ''.  Everything then would come back to zero except the body and mind of the experimenter:  If he had been hurt in the program, he would come back hurt.  If he had felt great happiness, he would come back with that feeling.

   Another complementary concept appeared recently with the movie "Matrix" 'which said that we live in a programmed and controlled virtual reality.  The hero was developing super powers because he understood how to reprogram reality.  The film "Avatar" explained a similar concept where the hero projected his consciousness into another body.

    Legends, stories, movies, novels, are often ways to give digestible messages for the general public.  Maybe we live in a three-dimensional reality included in other more complex realities, much like a game program in which the player creates an avatar.  He ends up identifying with that one and becoming this fictional character.  We come into this reality and we identify with our different roles until someone tells us: '' Wake up, you are a soul and you are playing in a virtual game ''. '' It's just a game! ''

    Maybe without realizing it, we give orders to a supercomputer, we program and reprogram our reality. This would explain the power of thought and faith. '' Your faith saved you! '' This would also explain why it takes 20-25 years of our life to 'educate' us and many TV programs to keep us idiots:  the thoughts of humans have to continue in the same pattern to generate the same programs to keep the stability of the control system.  This would explain the important role of the religions that frame our way of thinking.  In Canada, for example, if at school a child did not have a good grade for catechism, he could not succeed in his school year.  In other words, strengthening beliefs was more important than intelligence or academic knowledge.

   When we create visualizations to meditate, we do the same thing.  It is a particular application of these same concepts.  In meditation, I voluntarily create my reality and I will play in my imaginary mental body.  I then come back in the here and now.  But the happiness, the love, the peace that I have experienced remain with me and will accompany me.  If I only use the images and concepts of a religion, I am a prisoner of that group.  By using my own imagination and my own creativity, I am free.   I am out of the box, out of that particular program.

    When the Brahma Kumaris want to bring up the Golden Age, they do the same thing.  But as in the minds of the members, paradise is automatically associated with destruction, it is a double-edged sword that would reduce the number of players.  Indeed, it is possible that with 7.4 billion players, the super-computer and its programmers  have a little trouble controlling them all.  The question that comes up automatically is:  Who is the main programmer?  Who is on the keyboard?  I vote for an artificial intelligence; '' AI '' in English.  In other words, a sophisticated program that has become hyper-intelligent and tries to survive by cannibalizing different worlds to turn them into machines, into controllable robots.  This is what we see emerging with the projects of cyborgs, these human beings "improved" with implants.  In Star-trek, it was symbolized by the Borg, this robot-cube that assimilated all the living things it encountered.   You may do some research on Youtube with "cyborg bases miles johnston" or go to thebasesproject.org

   Each of us has a bar code, a number in the super-computer with his personal files, the history of his past lives, his mission, the state of his body, etc.  If we were a bit better, we could access anyone information.  This is what some psychic people do.  This is what happens in a regression in our other lives.  We access our hidden files.  This universal memory is called Akashic memory.

   The super computer records everything.  It is much better than those of the NSA.  So that at the end of our existence, when we reach our true original dimension, the fourth dimension, an '' angel '' can open our personal file and show us all the details of our lives in seconds.  So?  What is your score?  What is your karma?  Are you ready for another level, another challenge?

   Religious groups and others also create super-files of files that have their own characteristics, their own beliefs, habits, culture, etc.  They are called egregores.  Take a good Christian for example.  When he prays, he gives his I.D. his identity to the computer: "I am a Catholic Christian," which automatically directs him to the right section.  Then he enters his password, a prayer, or his particular way of addressing God: "I am a sinner" for example.  He then enter the Catholic super-file with give him access to different ideas, experiences, concepts related to this group in particular.  If he has a vision for example, it will be the Virgin Mary or Christ, not Vishnu or Kali, which would stress him a little ... LoL Visiting a Christian monastery, I had fun getting in touch with Christ.  The monk I was talking to a little later then looked at me with big, surprised eyes when I told him that I had seen Christ come to me in the church and put a crown (without thorns ;-)) on my head.  Similarly, for the Brahma Kumaris: their identity is '' I am a soul '' and the password is '' Baba ''.  It is then possible to meet a virtual character called subtle Brahma in the other dimension as I have done often.

   For that reason too, it is dangerous to take too much interest in criminal, demonic, magical, reptilian, etc. groups at the risk of entering their files and their world, being influenced and attracting their attention.  It is good to be informed but not too much.  The illuminatis-controlled media produce a lot of bizarre and violent movies for many people to access the super-files called "violence, war, sex, destruction, etc."  By accessing them, the audience reinforces them.  Instead, it is better to meditate on paradise.  But it is essential to voluntarily detach it from the notion of destruction to include all of humanity with 7,400,000,000 happy and harmonious souls.

   One of the last big "religions" that has been created is called "Facebook" with over a billion users.  On the one hand, this system provides a very practical and sophisticated free framework for creating our own group, our own tribe.  On the other hand, everyone gives all kinds of personal information to the system.  These pages allow Big Brother to easily monitor the population.  The day this system becomes fascist, when Shankar open his eye, it will already have all the information to identify the probable troublemakers.  It will start by eliminating their Facebook pages, which in fact do not belong to them, and ultimately eliminate them in person.  We can already see that some pages that do not agree with the philosophy of the 1% are censored and disappear.  The author can do nothing.  He gave his consent that nothing belonged to him to be able to use that particular program.   (I still remember that thought popping in my head at the beginning : i belongs to You and everything i have belongs to You.........)

    In reality, everyone can create his own independent website that he owns and controls
personally like this small site for example.  It's a little more work and less convenient but much safer and stable in the long run.

    Similarly, each of us, in another dimension, can create his own spiritual file, with his own concepts, beliefs, experiences, goals, information, etc.  This is the essence of spirituality.  For example, my identity may be '' I am a pure soul '' or '' I am a pure and powerful soul '' or '' I am an angel ''.  My password can be: '' peace and love '' or '' I am free ''.  I can then enter information and find them easily in meditation.  I just have to remember my identity and password at the beginning of my practice.  I just created a '' ritual '' of access.

    If I share my file with others, explaining to them and giving them my '' stuff '', they will be able to access and use it.  It's up to me to define permissions for users: do they have the right to change programs or just experiment without influencing anything?  When many people use this file, it becomes an egregore, a super-file more and more powerful and effective.  But since everyone is free to use their own password, it does not become a religion but a tool to develop their own spirituality.  Everyone can read the codes and spot bogs and viruses.  It is not dogmatic but a space of sharing.  This is what we see in many blogs. It is "Open Source" !!!

    When  in our passwords
we put words and images linking Love and Light: "I love you", "I love the Light", "Me and the Light, the Light and me" ... the connection is direct and very fast.  Faster than the speed of Light.

   By changing our thoughts, our concepts, we are influencing the virtual reality;  the world changes.  To understand the nature of reality and to reprogram it voluntarily, creatively, freely, outside the framework of predefined religions, is it what is called realization?

   Some factors seem to me particularly important to increase its effectiveness:

    - Love and contact, with the Source, the Light, God.
    - Intention.
    - Creative imagination.


Have fun!


  Conclusion

    When I come into contact with the Supreme Light that many people call The divine Source, I feel an intense feminine energy.  I can feel the quality of love of an unlimited Mother.  It is at the same time powerful, subtle, limitless, indescribable.  For me, the Creator is feminine.

    The Supreme lives in the highest dimension.  As each higher dimension encompasses and penetrates the other dimensions below, we find notions of quantum physics where one has the impression that an atom is in two places at a time.  That is why some people say that God is everywhere.  In fact, it is simply because we have access to the Sublime Source very easily no matter where we are.  Just with a thought.

  In conclusion, I believe that the basic knowledge of Brahma Kumaris is good and effective.  In other words, the first courses about soul, Supreme Soul, yoga, soul world and karma are excellent.

     I believe that the Brahma kumaris are in a vast majority very beautiful souls with good intentions.

   But,  I believe that the notion of destruction is totally at the opposite of the divine plan of love for all beings.

  I believe that it is not God who is teaching gyan.

  I also have serious doubts about the destination of the last departure of the BKs.


   I found some people on the internet who also believe that the «dark side» is masquerading as divine beings to mislead people.  You may listen to this Youtube interview which describe very well what I explained here in this web page.

       https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qzun3f1OjhE


  I do not pretend having all the answers or that my beliefs of today will never change, but I would like to bring enough elements so that each of us reflects, discriminates and chooses by himself and for himself.

    Free will is one of the fundamental universal divine laws.

   I make this little web site out of love for God, for my spiritual family and all the beings of the universe.


    Have fun,


             I wish Peace and Love on earth and on every planet.


                                




                







Top               





























 M
 e
 n
 u
















 M
 e
 n
 u















 M
 e
 n
 u















 M
 e
 n
 u
















 M
 e
 n
 u
















 M
 e
 n
 u



















 M
 e
 n
 u




















 M
 e
 n
 u





















 M
 e
 n
 u






















 M
 e
 n
 u





















 M
 e
 n
 u






















 M
 e
 n
 u





















 M
 e
 n
 u





















 M
 e
 n
 u


























 M
 e
 n
 u





















 M
 e
 n
 u






















 M
 e
 n
 u


















 M
 e
 n
 u

























  M
 e
 n
 u






























 M
 e
 n
 u





















 M
 e
 n
 u

























  M
 e
 n
 u






























 M
 e
 n
 u


































 M
 e
 n
 u































 M
 e
 n
 u